Argumentative Essay About Anal Penetration - 1460 Words

In life, I have stated that I am willing to try almost anything. This is generally true, moreover, I love new experiences and the insights that they give me, but there were a few activities that I was still unwilling to try for a variety of reasons. I have always been curious about anal penetration. It was always something that I said I would NEVER do, but there was still something that intrigued me about it. Over the course of the last few years, I have slowly started to become more open to trying it. I thought through my hesitations about it and realized that I felt as though it was predominantly societal pressure not to do it, which was ultimately stopping me. Furthermore, I am a firm believer in not letting other people’s views on me†¦show more content†¦I was able to be vulnerable and emotional with my partner. I felt like I could open up about what was working and what wasn’t without fear that they would become upset. I know deep down that they would neve r get frustrated with me about something going wrong sexually, but I feel like it has been ingrained in me to believe that they would. With the new found confidence that my partner and I instilled in myself, we were able to end up trying anal penetration with a finger about three weeks later. This was a wonderful experience. My partner gave me full control of what was happening. It was an amazing way to try it for the first time. It is always important to trust the person you are with and this experience reaffirmed my confidence in them. I haven’t been that sexually comfortable with another person in a long time. It is problematical in life to say that something is acceptable or not for we each hold our own opinions. I do believe that when it comes to matters of the bedroom that it is important to realize certain undertakings are absolutely none of our business as a society. There seems to be this common misconception out there, perpetuated by a phrase, that puts pressure on people to stay away from anal. â€Å"This is an exit only!† According to Morin (as cited in Nienke Van Dijk, 2013), â€Å"The taboo on anal sexuality, Morin believes, is accompanied by an ambivalence and emotional charge, which makes this conversation too

Racism Without Racists Essay - 1059 Words

Over the years, the face of racism has taken on many forms. In present day America, racism is a very taboo subject. It a common view that racism is not a big issue anymore, given the large strides that we, as a country have made towards equality. However, the inequalities that still exist between races point to a different situation. Instead of the blatantly discriminatory acts that our nation has witnessed in the past, modern racism practices are more covert and seemingly nonracial, making this kind of discrimination seem more acceptable and politically correct. The Civil Rights Movement forced society to implement a new, subtler way to perpetuate racial inequality. In Racism Without Racists, Bonilla-Silva describes the justification†¦show more content†¦This explanation of inequality places the blame on the victim, attributing status to a culture’s â€Å"lack of effort, loose family organization, and inappropriate values.† (40). Finally, Bonilla-Silva id entifies the minimization of racism as the last framework in the colorblind ideology. This frame posits that minorities aren’t affected by racism anymore; racism is â€Å"better now than in the past.† (29). Bonilla-Silva asserts that whites use these frames both separately and collectively as a way of justifying turning their backs on the realities of racial inequality. This chapter on the framework of the colorblind ideology seems to be the most concrete and logical chapter in the book. This chapter is very well put together, with examples that cover a wide variety of topics. He also illustrates the concept of the frameworks playing into one another very well. The premise of these four frameworks as an â€Å"impregnable yet elastic wall that barricades whites from the United States’ racial reality† makes perfect logical sense as an explanation for the â€Å"racism without racists† culture seen in the US (47). Changing attitudes towards race relations forced a change in the manifestation of racist ideologies. Bonilla-Silva also discusses the style of color-blindness. He asserts that due to the change in post-Civil Rights era thoughts on discrimination, whites had to changeShow MoreRelatedThe New Threat : Racism Without Racists2278 Words   |  10 Pagesimpede discrimination of all kinds especially racial profiling. The debate of racism has never stopped even in January 20th, 2009 when the American nation elected its forty-fourth president of the United States who was the first African-American president in the entire American History. â€Å"Racism is over,† many people became very excited and delighted, â€Å"America had chosen a black man to lead the nation, there is no more racism.† However, a lot of undesired incidents that occurred after that in many statesRead MoreRacism Without Racists, By Jordan Peele797 Words   |  4 Pagesform of covert racism existing in a post- Jim Crow era. Similarly, Eduardo Bonilla- Silva’s book Racism Without Racists acknowledges th e contemporary system of racism or â€Å"new racism,† a system of covert racism currently utilized to subjugate minorities. In this section, I will analyze distinctive parts of Get Out that portray white liberal attitudes towards African Americans and compare it to Racism Without Racists in order to illustrate the common acknowledgement of a new racism. Keep in mind, itRead MoreRacism Without Racists By Eduardo Bonilla Slave849 Words   |  4 Pagesdiscrimination as black people did; I did not feel strong oppression as LGBT group did; however, I was indeed treated in a different way, which was racist and discriminated. When I read the materials from class, I felt I had experienced the exactly same thing in my life. Segregation, which was written by Eduardo Bonilla-Slave in his book: Racism without Racists, still happened today in my life; marginalization and powerlessness, which were proposed by Iris Young in her book: Five Faces of Oppression, wereRead MoreEssay about Edua rdo Bonilla-Silvas Book, Racism Without Racists1653 Words   |  7 Pagesdiscusses the new racism in his book, Racism without Racists. Bonilla-Silva classifies the new racial discrimination as color blind racism. Color blind racism is then structured under four frames (26). Color blind racism is believed to have lead to the segregation of the white race from other minorities called white habitus. Color blind racism and white habitus has affected many people, whom don’t even realize that they are, have been or will be affected. Color blind racism is an â€Å"ideology,Read MoreThe Heart Of Racism, And Tommie Shelby Paper1177 Words   |  5 PagesWhat is racism? The Merriam-Webster’s dictionary defines racism as â€Å"a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race†. Is it actions or beliefs that make someone or something fundamentally racist? These are the main ideas behind J.L.A Garcia’s paper â€Å"The Heart of Racism† and Tommie Shelby paper â€Å"Is Racism in the Heart?† Exposition of the opposed position: According to Garcia racism is definedRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book Long Division Essay1272 Words   |  6 Pagescharacters in this book will have to face racism and learn to defy racial representations, especially during the scene of the quiz contest. Overall, this essay will tackle the importance of language in the book Long Division and analyze the actions of the characters and the emotions they display. This essay will examine the words written and the racism experienced during the period using the two sources and research made to understand the importance of language in racism. Long Division, the book written byRead MoreRacism And The Civil Rights Moment Era1076 Words   |  5 PagesColor-blind racism has a linguistic style which forms when dominate groups speak about subordinate groups without sounding racist. The author describes it as using â€Å"thread to join pieces of fabric into garments.† (Bonilla-Silva, Pg.53). â€Å"If the garment is being assembled in an op en forum (with minorities present or in public venues), dominant actors will weave its fibers carefully (‘I am not a racist, but†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ) and not too tight (I am not black, so I don’t know†). If, in contrast, the needlework isRead MoreIs Racism in the Heart? by Tommie Shelby Essay1343 Words   |  6 Pages Racism is not a factor of the heart, according to Tommie Shelby in â€Å"Is Racism in the ‘Heart’?† He writes â€Å"the ‘heart’ does not have to be involved in order for an action or institution to be racist† (483). Instead, Shelby argues that racism is based on the effect of a person’s actions on deepening racist institutions or promulgating the oppression of a particular group of people based on their race. The individual intention of a person or the â€Å"purity† or his or her heart does not take precedenceRead MoreDoes Racism Still Exist?1549 Words   |  7 PagesDoes racism still exist? This is one of the countless controversies between people today in which many people might answer â€Å"no†. Others may agree with Eduardo Bonilla-Silva, a sociology professor at Duke University. Bonilla-Silva argues that racism still exists, but has become more subtle since the end of segregation. Bonilla-Silva refers to this new raci sm as color-blind racism. This term is defined by Bonilla-Silva in his book, White Supremacy and Racism in the Post-Civil Rights Era, as, A newRead MoreRacism : Racism And Racism1544 Words   |  7 PagesTo understand whether or not racism is learnt, we first have to divulge into the nature of racism. It is usually assumed that racism has been a part of civilisation since civilisation started, that it is embedded into how people work and that no matter what, it will always exist. Another assumption is that racism derives from the capitalism of the slave trade by white elitist men seeking to dehumanize people for economic gain, and used racism as a way to mask their financial motives to justify enslavement

Taxation Immigration in Ordinary Income

Question: Describe about the Taxation for Immigration in Ordinary Income. Answer: Residence and source of an individual: Residential status of an individual is important to determine its tax liability for the assessment year. According to Australian Law if a person resides in the country for more than a period of six months than he/she is eligible to pay tax. The person has certain benefits to enjoy i.e. he can freely subsidized to legal services of the country (Brown, Handley and O'Day, 2015). However, in case of Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Miller (1946) it was found that the court has made certain amendments in the residential status of an individual. The residential status of migrants has been withdrawn from the act on 25th November 1998 because it does not provide much detail on the residency of an individual. It is difficult to calculate the residential status in between six months to two years (TR 98/17 Para 7). According to Australian, law the ruling for taxation based on certain categories: A person should be the permanent resident of another country. The person visited Australia under working visa issued by the Department of Immigration. The person visits the country with an intention to work for a certain period. The person stays in a temporary accommodation. The person receives calls from his family from his original country. The person receives a contract for work. The person has opened a bank account in Australia. The main issues to examine in this case are: The period of physical presence in the country. The behavior of the person during his stay in the country The purpose of his presence His family and employment ties. As per Para 17 of TR 98/17, if an individual arrives in Australia without any intention to stay in the country permanently than all the evidence about his stay is to be included while calculating his residential status (Grubert and Altshuler 2016). As in the given case, Fred who resides in UK visited Australia for a period of eleven months. The main purpose of his visit was to establish a branch of his business in Australia. Furthermore, he leased a house in Melbourne for the period of one year. His wife accompanied with him during his visit. His daily behavior was similar as before entering to Australia. According to the law he is a resident of Australia. Para 49 of TR 98/17 states that if a person stays in the country for a short period he cannot be termed as resident of the country but in case of Fred, the stay was more than a period of six months. During his stay, he was continuously in touch with his kids who reside in UK for their educational purpose. Moreover, he has leased one house in Melbourne, which means that he visited the country for business purpose only. The income, which he earned during his stay, is liable for tax (Ato.gov.au 2016). Ordinary income: Ordinary income includes all the assessable income of an individual, which is derived from various sources during the year. In case of Californian Copper Syndicate Ltd v Harris (Surveyor of Taxes) (1904) 5 TC 159 it was found that the owner of the property chooses his investment to realize it and obtains a greater price for it but he actually acquires the asset. In the sense of assessable income the enhanced price realized by an individual will not be considered as profit .In the similar case of FCT v Myer Emporium Ltd (1987) the court directed that the receipt from an isolated transaction will be considered as an income if the transaction was made with the intention of profit. The court further directs that everything, which a person derives, is not an income; it depends on the nature of the business. Another example of the rule is found in the case of Rangatira Ltd v CIR. The decisions of this case are important to satisfy the factual test of income for taxation purpose. The taxpayer carried on an investment business. The board of directors of the company was independent businesspersons with no sharehol dings in the company. The policy of the members of the company was to maintain the capital funds of the taxpayers only. They ensure that there was a regular income only which was derived by dividend yield method. In case of Scottish Australian Mining Co Ltd v FC of T (1950) 81 CLR 188 it was found that the taxpayer has purchased some of his land in between 1863 and 1865 for his coal mining business. In the year 1924 his mine exhausted and the person decided to dispose off his land. The court directed that the company has taken advantageous steps to incur the value of land. Hence, the value they incur is not a profit and the amount should not be included in assessable income. However, the judiciary has altered the decision of the court in case of Whitfords Beach case. In case of FC of T v Whitfords Beach Pty Ltd (1982) 150 CLR the company bought a piece of land to carry on the fishing business on it. On December 20, 1967 the shareholders of the company decided to sell the land by sub-dividing it so that they can earn some profit from the land. The articles of the company were amended on the same day of disposal of the land. The court in this case directed that the income derived from this transaction is to be termed as profit and hence is chargeable under the head for taxation purpose. According to Gibbs CJ if a taxpayer only, realize an asset than it is not included in the profit but in the given case, the taxpayer continued his business with the motive of earning profit. The activities continued by him are of commercial nature only. Hence, the income is to be treated as a profit and is liable for tax (Ato.gov.au 2016).. In case of Statham Anor v FC of T 89 ATC 4070 the taxpayers of this case were the trustees of an estate. The person has obtained the land with an intention of farming. After some years the person sold his land to the company which is controlled by his family members only. The deal did not perform well for the company. Later on, they decided to sell the land. The original owner of the property was dead at that time to sell the land. The court in this case decided that the income derived from disposing off the land is an assessable income for the person but the owners of the property argued that the sale of land does not form an ordinary income under the act. The court gave its verdict on the basis that the agricultural business was failed and the members of the company decided to sell the property. Hence, the property is liable for taxation (Ato.gov.au 2016). . Similar case of McCORKELL v FC of T, Administrative Appeals Tribunal of Australia (Victoria), 28 July 1998 In case of Casimaty v FC of T 97 ATC 5135 the person bought a land for farming purpose from his father and continued his business for more than two decades. Due to his illness, the person decided to sell some portion of his land. The taxpayer has made certain changes to the property by constructing road and developing irrigation facilities on it. The commissioner directed that the activities carried on by the taxpayer are an assessable income whereas the court directed that the profit made by him is the part of realization of capital asset. He purchased the land for agricultural purpose only. Hence the profit which he earned is not an assessable income. Similar case Allied Pastoral Holdingsv FCT83 ATC 4015, In case of Moana Sand Pty Ltd v FC of T 88 ATC 4897 the company purchase a piece of land in Adelaide to continue its business. The company bought a piece of land with an intention to sell it in the future if they receive a good amount for it. According to the law the value received by redemption of property after deducting the cost of the acquisition is to be treated as assessable income. Hence, the profit earned by the company is an assessable income. Similar case Marbut Gunnersen IndustriesPty Ltd v FC of T82ATC4182 . In case of Crow v FC of T 88 ATC 4620 a person purchased five blocks of land within a period of ten years. The farmer used the land for farming purchase but later on he dispose it by making a profit of $388,288. The court directed that the person is liable for tax for this income. Earlier he used this land for farming purpose but later on he sold it. The person knew that the debt which he incurs can be cleared by disposing the property only. Therefore, he sold some parts of the land to incur money. Hence, chargeable to tax. Similar case Estates Ltd v FC of T (1 941) 64 CLR 241 In case of McCurry Anor v FC of T 98 ATC 4487 the person bought a land. An old house was there already. The person constructed three new houses on that land. The person acquired two houses for his own purpose and occupied it for a period of one year. He made profit of $150,000 by disposing the entire houses within that period. After sometime he again purchased a block of land, constructed a house on it, and later on sold it. The commissioner directed that the money, which he earned from selling, is of commercial purpose and is to be treated as assessable income (Ato.gov.au 2016). However, the person argued that the income which he earned by selling is of capital nature because he sold his property to meet his financial needs. The court held that the activity was of commercial purpose only because he bought a piece of land, constructed houses on it and later on sold it by making profit. Therefore, the activity is to be treated as commercial activity only. His intention was to make profit only. He did not hold the property for investment purpose. Hence, the income is assessable and liable for tax. Similar is the case McClelland v FC of T 70 ATC 4115; (1970) 120 CLR 487. Conclusion: From the above analysis, it can be said that the residential status is important for a person to determine his taxable income. To safeguard the assesses from double taxation the government of the country introduce the concept. On the other hand in case of ordinary income the verdict of court varies from case to case because of the nature of the business. It is important to check the nature of transaction before concluding the assessability of it. References: Astell-Burt, T., Feng, X., Mavoa, S., Badland, H.M. and Giles-Corti, B., 2014. Do low-income neighbourhoods have the least green space? A cross-sectional study of Australias most populous cities.BMC Public Health,14(1), p.1. Ato.gov.au. (2016).Home page | Australian Taxation Office. [online] Available at: https://www.ato.gov.au/ [Accessed 7 Sep. 2016]. Brown, C., Handley, J. and O'Day, J., 2015. The dividend substitution hypothesis: Australian evidence.Abacus,51(1), pp.37-62. Chalmers, J., Carragher, N., Davoren, S. and OBrien, P., 2013. Real or perceived impediments to minimum pricing of alcohol in Australia: public opinion, the industry and the law.International Journal of Drug Policy,24(6), pp.517-523. Crawford, G.C., Aguinis, H., Lichtenstein, B., Davidsson, P. and McKelvey, B., 2015. Power law distributions in entrepreneurship: Implications for theory and research.Journal of Business Venturing,30(5), pp.696-713. Grubert, H. and Altshuler, R., 2016. Shifting the Burden of Taxation from the Corporate to the Personal Level and Getting the Corporate Tax Rate Down to 15 Percent.National Tax Journal,69(3). Herrmann, S., Wardrop, J., John, M., Gaudieri, S., Lucas, M., Mallal, S. and Nolan, D., 2012. The impact of visa status and Medicare eligibility on people diagnosed with HIV in Western Australia: a qualitative report.Sexual health,9(5), pp.407-413. Kwon, J.A., Anderson, J., Kerr, C.C., Thein, H.H., Zhang, L., Iversen, J., Dore, G.J., Kaldor, J.M., Law, M.G., Maher, L. and Wilson, D.P., 2012. Estimating the cost-effectiveness of needle-syringe programs in Australia.Aids,26(17), pp.2201-2210. Pedersen, A., Fozdar, F. and Kenny, M.A., 2012. Battling boatloads of prejudice: An interdisciplinary approach to activism with asylum seekers and refugees in Australia. InPeace psychology in Australia(pp. 121-137). Springer US. Powdthavee, N., Lekfuangfu, W.N. and Wooden, M., 2013. The marginal income effect of education on happiness: Estimating the direct and indirect effects of compulsory schooling on well-being in Australia. Topp, L., Iversen, J., Baldry, E., Maher, L. and Collaboration of Australian NSPs, 2013. Housing instability among people who inject drugs: results from the Australian needle and syringe program survey.Journal of Urban Health,90(4), pp.699-716. Unit, M.C., 2013. State of Australian cities 2013.Canberra: Department of Infrastructure and Transport.

Suffering In Crime And Punishment Essays - Literature, Fiction

Suffering in Crime and Punishment Suffering in Crime and Punishment In the novel Crime and Punishment, by Fyodor Dostoevsky, suffering is an integral part of every character's role. However, the message that Dostoevsky wants to present with the main character, Raskolnikov, is not one of the Christian idea of salvation through suffering. Rather, it appears to me, as if the author never lets his main character suffer mentally throughout the novel, in relation to the crime, that is. His only pain seems to be physical sicknes. Raskolnikov commits a premeditated murder in a state of delirium. He ends up committing a second murder, which he never ever wanted to be responsible for. He kills Lizaveta, an exceedingly innocent person. But does the author ever remind us of the murder at any time in the novel again? Not in the physical sense of the crime itself. The reader doesn't hear about how heavily the murders are weighing on his heart, or how he is tormented by visions of the crime. He doesn't feel the least bit g uilty about having committed the crime, only his pride's hurt. He doesn't mention the idea of the pain that might arise from recurrent visions of the crime. Raskolnikov never again recalls the massive amounts of blood everywhere, the look on Lizaveta's face when he brings down the axe on her head. These things clearly show that the crime isn't what might cause him suffering, or pain, it is something else. After Raskolnikov is sent off to Siberia, he doesn't feel remorseful. His feelings haven't changed about his crime, he feels bad at not being able to living up to his own ideas of greatness. He grows depressed only when he learns of his mother's death. Raskolnikov still hasn't found any reason to feel remorse for his crimes. He takes Siberia as his punishment, because of how annoying it is to go through all these formalities, and ridicularities that it entails. Yet, he actually feels more comfortable in Siberia than in his home in St. Petersburg. It's more comfortable, and has better living conditions than his own home. But he isn't free to do whatever he likes. But this does not contradict what I've said before. He doesn't view Siberia as suffering, but he does view it as punishment, because he would rather not have to go through seven years in his prison cell. His theory of the extraordinary, and the ordinary is something he has to follow and adhere to . His necessity to suffer is a part of his necessity to fulfill his unknown criteria to be extraordinary. His suffering, if any, is purely superficial. The idea of suffering has to be heartfelt and well-specified. Raskolnikov's suffering is never spoken about, mainly because there is none. Even Raskolnikov views his turning himself in as a blunder, because he couldn't take the heat. It is obvious that Raskolnikov never seems to be in a pit of despair from all the suffering he has to face from the effect of the murder. One might argue that Raskolnikov's illnesses arise from his guilt and remors e for the crimes, but that doesn't appear possible. Since the character never cites the murder for his sickness. In fact, Raskolnikov fell immediately sick after committing the murder. How could he struck by guilt five seconds after committing the murder when he hasn't even had a chance to see what events have just occurred? There is not a single instance when Raskolnikov, or the author for that matter, ever cite the dramatic effect of the murders on Raskolnikov's conscience for his terrible illness. NOTHING in the novel would even imply that he feels remorse about committing the murders, it is just a silly idea that has been implanted in people's minds and the seed has spread too rapidly, without analization.It is incredibly obvious that all the so-called pain and suffering that Raskolnikov feels is untrue, silly, and backed by no support. It would be incredulously moronic to attempt to view it from another point of understanding. People are entitled to their own opinions but t he beliefs of the at error majority should not overbear the beliefs of the correct minority. Acceptance of a